Tuesday, October 03, 2006

The Conservatives

I don’t know what to make of all this - David Cameron, Oliver Letwin and George Osborne - the new, ‘liberal conservatives’. Not compassionate conservatives or neo-conservatives, but liberal conservatives. People have cried ‘all style and no substance’ but the next election is still two years away, what good would policies be now? Cameron is right to keep his cards close to his chest.

I want to like Cameron because I don’t like Brown. I think the chancellor will betray the New Labour program and I don’t like Reid much either because I think he will taint the project with his authoritarian streak. What is needed is a rejuvenated Conservative party, one that does change, that does adapt, that does hold true to core British values. William Hague, still the strongest speaker the party has, used his speech to set out in vivid detail how past conservative leaders have been willing to face internal opposition and change to make their parties relevant. I think his right and I think Britain and the world needs a strong Conservative party. The centre ground is where elections are won, Cameron can see that, and so can his regime – but his party still seems nervous and uncomfortable with leaving the comfort zone of Daily Mail politics.

They need to be bold and aggressive and brave. Cameron needs to be bold and aggressive and brave. They don’t need to scrap New Labour, they need to streamline it, and take it to its inevitable conclusion - A progressive and flexible welfare economy.

All these things have to be done; yet I am not sure Cameron has the strength of conviction - or the strength of delivery - to do these things. He would, perhaps unfortunately, make an excellent ‘Minister without Portfolio’ where his marketing talents could work behind the scenes to smooth the election campaign. But his not a public relations advisor, he is the party leader. He is walking in the footsteps of the heavyweights of history. He is entering the same league as Churchill and Thatcher. Yet he seems to be far too smooth for his own good, almost smooth to the point of indifference. If people are to take him seriously he has to change this, he has to dig deep and find his reserves of leadership and passion.

Through some cringe worthy marketing gimmicks he now has the publics attention, he must go on to show them what he is made of. In Blair, Labour had a leader who could drag his party, and the public, kicking and screaming into the future. Now Cameron must do the same for the Conservatives.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"People have cried ‘all style and no substance’ but the next election is still two years away, what good would policies be now? Cameron is right to keep his cards close to his chest."

This is a major party that has been around for a long time. It has changed and adapted like any party to the needs and views of the period. What right has it to call itself a major party if it has no policy or clear direction? I'd expect a party to always have focus and drive to specific goals.

True, those goals are in flux currently, but they're holding a party conference for Christ's sake. The Cons have lost their way and are now scramblign to pick up the pieces.

They have two years. Perhpas they'll reassemble things in time.

8:27 pm  
Blogger Benjamin Nakizo said...

Post conference now I am actually less sure of them now that when they began.

I have issues with all this rubbish about firstly looking like the good guys by being against ID cards - and then turning round and wanting to take us out of the Human Rights Act and replace it with a very dubious sounding 'British Rights Act'. When did Brits stop being human?

I'll take the ID card please.

The only highlight from the conference seemed to be the guest speakers, Hague and Osborne (who is actually very impressive).

What do i do now!? I don't like either of the major parties. I don't like this. The next two years are going to be hell. I'm moving to America. They recon it will be McCain versus Hillary. Americans will never vote for a woman. ever.

that's what I wil do - I shall channel my anger at my own political system into some good old anti-americanism. Hillary. A woman. Ha. In Arkansas a woman isn't even allowed a minor admin role in a church - and now you ask them to let one rule the country?

Heaven forbid. Ha.

Grr. Do you know what is sad? the Lib Dems. That's what's sad. they are the only alternative? god help us if we get a 'hung' Parliament. God help us if we don't.

Even my beloved Greens are out of touch tree huggers. UKIP? - please. BNP? - I'd rather vote for an Arkansan. Respect? - that unholy alliance of illiberal Muslims and a power mad personality? please, i'd rather BE an Arkansan.

Aghhhh.

Rant continues away from screen...

2:53 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home